Prediction of Pam Teeguarden vs Beverly Bowes Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
P. Teeguarden vs B. Bowes

Pam Teeguarden

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Title

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Beverly Bowes

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Title

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Teeguarden 1 - 0 Bowes

They have played 2 sets in total, with Pam Teeguarden winning 2 and Beverly Bowes winning 0. The last match between Pam Teeguarden and Beverly Bowes was at the Nashville, 28-02-1983, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Pam Teeguarden getting the victory 6-1 7-5.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Teeguarden	1
Bowes	0

Last H2H Matches:

(R3) Nashville(02-28-83)

Stats

Pam Teeguarden

Beverly Bowes

P. Teeguarden vs B. Bowes H2H Profile

P. Teeguarden	Stats	B. Bowes
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
47.87% (315-343)	Career Total W/L	50.55% (183-179)
1	Hard	0
0	Titles	3
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

P. Teeguarden vs B. Bowes Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pam Teeguarden has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Beverly Bowes has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pam Teeguarden, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Beverly Bowes has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Pam Teeguarden has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Beverly Bowes has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Pam Teeguarden has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Beverly Bowes winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Pam Teeguarden has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 57% (W/L 48/36), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 54/63). Beverly Bowes has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 59/46), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 11% (W/L 1/8).
Player level: In the last year, Pam Teeguarden has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Beverly Bowes has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Pam Teeguarden winning 1 times and Beverly Bowes being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Pam Teeguarden winning 2 and Beverly Bowes winning 0.
The last match between Pam Teeguarden and Beverly Bowes was at the Nashville, 28-02-1983, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Pam Teeguarden getting the victory 6-1 7-5.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pam Teeguarden has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Beverly Bowes has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pam Teeguarden has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Beverly Bowes has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Pam Teeguarden has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Beverly Bowes has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Pam Teeguarden vs Beverly Bowes Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

P. Teeguarden vs B. Bowes H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

P. Teeguarden	Stats	B. Bowes
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	6
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

P. Teeguarden Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Unknown Tournament - 27-05-1985
R1 Martina NavratilovaM. Navratilova	L	6-1 6-0	Stats
Oakland - 18-02-1985
Q1 Molly Van NostrandM. Van	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
Delray Beach - 05-02-1985
R1 Sabrina GolesS. Goles	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
Marco Island - 28-01-1985
Q1 Catherine SuireC. Suire	L	2-6 7-5 6-0	Stats
Key Biscayne - 21-01-1985
Q1 Ginny PurdyG. Purdy	L	3-6 6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

B. Bowes Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Houston - 10-04-1995
Q2 Marlene WeingartnerM. Weingartner	L	7-5 6-3	Stats
Q1 Vickie PaynterV. Paynter	W	7-5 2-6 6-0	Stats
Amelia Island - 03-04-1995
Q1 Tatjana JecmenicaT. Jecmenica	W	7-5 2-6 6-4	Stats
Q2 Silvia Ramon CortesS. Ramon	L	7-6 4-6 6-2	Stats
Key Biscayne - 17-03-1995
Q1 Maria Vento KabchiM. Vento	L	6-3 3-6 6-3	Stats

View All

P. Teeguarden vs B. Bowes Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

P. Teeguarden	Stats	B. Bowes
47.87% (315/343)	YTD Win/Loss	50.55% (183/179)
48.86% (729/763)	Sets Win/Loss	51.25% (431/410)
50.06% (6862/6846)	Games Win/Loss	50.97% (3877/3729)
49.32% (72/74)	Hard Win/Loss	53.72% (101/87)
46.15% (54/63)	Clay Win/Loss	56.19% (59/46)
39.62% (63/96)	Indoor Hard W/L	37.50% (6/10)
57.14% (48/36)	Grass Win/Loss	11.11% (1/8)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
108.6	Average Opponent Rank	382.77
57.14% (12/9)	Slam W/L	45.45% (5/6)
58.33% (7/5)	Challenger W/L	72.15% (57/22)
49.64% (68/69)	Futures W/L	33.33% (13/26)
48% (307/646)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	51% (183/358)
0% (0/2)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/2)
50% (6/12)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	29% (6/21)
41% (78/191)	Deciding Set Win %	47% (56/119)
82% (325/266)	1st Set Won, Won Match	81% (204/165)
18% (325/59)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	19% (204/38)
13% (326/42)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	11% (157/18)